|
|
|
|
|
Sunday, July 5, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Cliff (6,900 ft)
Pinecliff, CO
|
1502 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Moffat Tunnel (UP)
|
BNSF
|
The conductor for the eastbound BNSF manifest in the siding (on the left) is on the ground right at milepost 37. He gives a wave up to the conductor for the westbound BNSF manifest on the main. This train had some engine problems and the conductor had to walk back to the DPUs. After getting the issue resolved, he simply rode in the DPU up to Cliff where a track maintainer was waiting to give him a ride back up to the head end.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunday, July 5, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Cliff (6,900 ft)
Pinecliff, CO
|
1591 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Moffat Tunnel (UP)
|
BNSF
|
Ironically, when I decided to head west for the Moffat on this day, I was actually hoping to see some UP action! I should have known that, instead, I would find BNSF trains running in both directions. After stalling out (due to engine issues) at Crescent, the westbound on the main has finally made it to Cliff. Its counterpart sits in the siding, waiting for him to clear.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sunday, July 5, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Cliff (6,900 ft)
Pinecliff, CO
|
1671 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Moffat Tunnel (UP)
|
BNSF
|
Hurry up and wait! You can frequently hear that said when it comes to trains. The day after the 4th of July in 2015 was no exception on the Moffat. This eastbound BNSF manifest has been waiting in the siding at Cliff for nearly an hour. It is waiting on its counterpart, which encountered some engine problems and stalled out at Crescent. The track (out of focus) in the foreground in the Cliff House Track, which has a noticeable grade down to prevent cars from rolling out on to the siding.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, June 26, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Broomfield (8,976ft)
Broomfield, CO
|
1767 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Front Range (BNSF)
|
BNSF
|
Six GEs (of varying model) lead BNSF's Cheyenne to Denver manifest. The train is stopped about 2,500 feet north of the north switch of Broomfield. The train is waiting for a lone GP39-3 to get in the clear. Once it is in the clear, the dispatcher will give the Cheyenne-Denver a track warrant with a "Box 4", which will allow it to perform some work. Specifically, two of the C44-9Ws on the train (the 4th and 5th units) are to be set out at Broomfield to work on a maintenance train. Once complete, the train will receive a new warrant and continue the rest of the way in to Denver.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, June 26, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Broomfield (8,976ft)
Broomfield, CO
|
1690 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Front Range (BNSF)
|
BNSF
|
A single GP39-3 proceeds north on the mainline (away from the photographer) at Broomfield. If you look in the distance (near the right side of the frame), you'll notice the headlights of a southbound. Not to worry though. The southbound has a track warrant that doesn't take it any further than where it is at. Same goes for the light engine. The light engine will stop north of the switch at North Broomfield and back on the maintenance of way cars in the siding on the right.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, June 26, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Broomfield (8,976ft)
Broomfield, CO
|
1729 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Front Range (BNSF)
|
BNSF
|
There are folks out there that do not care for roster shots...and I understand why. Personally, I don't mind them so long as that isn't the only type of picture you are looking at in a photo update. I actually like checking out roster shots from various railroads / models / paint schemes from year ago. Perhaps this little BNSF GP39-3 (rebuilt from a GP35) will be a nice catch for someone out there.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, June 26, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Broomfield (8,976ft)
Broomfield, CO
|
1718 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Front Range (BNSF)
|
BNSF
|
A close look at the new (south) switch at Broomfield. Obviously not nearly complete yet, once this switch is moved, the siding of Broomfield will no longer have any grade crossing. This is part of a project that will connect 120th Avenue and CO-128 in Broomfield. In order for the two roads to be connected, they must run underneath BNSF's Front Range Sub. That underpass does not exist today and has not yet been started. But the underpass would pass underneath both the main and the siding. With the relocation of the south switch (shifting the siding north), the tracks can switch from the main line alignment to the siding alignment and back during construction of the the underpass, while still maintaining the use of the Broomfield siding.
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Friday, June 26, 2015
|
Kevin Morgan
|
|
|
|
Broomfield (8,976ft)
Broomfield, CO
|
1745 (Add a Comment)
|
|
|
|
|
Front Range (BNSF)
|
BNSF
|
The south end of Broomfield is moving! Crews have already cut in the new switch, just north (geographically west) of Nickel Street. This switch is roughly 4,000 feet north of the old south switch. To make up the difference, BNSF is extending the siding to the north by roughly 3,800 feet. When all is said and done, Broomfield should be about 8,700 feet long and will no longer have any grade crossing!
Email Questions or Comments to the Webmaster
or add a comment to the picture.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|